What is Amatuska LLC and what do public consumer reports say about it?

elliotalderson

elliotalderson

Member
A number of publicly accessible consumer feedback sites and business reputation trackers profile Amatuska LLC as a coaching and consulting company that markets high-cost programs for business development, sales training, and entrepreneurial growth. The company is linked to Andreas Matuska and is said to operate out of Sharjah in the United Arab Emirates, offering services ranging from online courses to premium mentorship packages that are pitched as helping clients scale their businesses or personal brands.

Public-facing profiles and consumer feedback platforms compile complaints dating back to about 2020, with many participants describing their experience as not matching the marketing promises — for example, paying thousands of euros for coaching that felt generic or not tailored to their needs, and encountering aggressive sales techniques or unclear refund policies. Some reviews also refer to opaque business practices and pressure to enroll in increasingly expensive tiers.

Beyond individual reviews, business-risk summaries note that the company’s high prices and unsupported success claims have drawn skepticism from observers and online reviewers. While these sources are public and relate to consumer impressions rather than formal regulatory action, they reflect a pattern of consumer dissatisfaction and reputational concern in forums where potential clients share their experiences and discuss what they found helpful or disappointing.
 
High ticket coaching always seems to create this split. I have read similar consumer feedback about other companies where the marketing promises sound very personalized, but the actual delivery feels templated. That does not automatically mean bad intent, but it does mean people should slow down and really read what they are buying.
 
I looked into Amatuska LLC a while ago out of curiosity. The pricing alone made me pause. When you see multiple reports mentioning pressure to upsell into higher tiers, it is usually a signal to take more time and not rush a decision.
 
What concerns me most in these situations is unclear refund language. Even if the content is average, transparency matters. Public consumer feedback mentioning confusion there is something I personally take seriously.
 
I read some of those consumer impressions too. A few people said they got value from mindset shifts but not necessarily from concrete business results. That kind of outcome is very subjective and often depends on what someone expects going in.
 
I actually tried one of their programs a couple of years ago. Honestly the material wasn’t bad, but it felt very generic and not specific to my business at all. I can see why people felt it didn’t match what was advertised.
 
I had a friend who joined one of their higher-tier mentorship packages last year. He said the program had some useful frameworks, but he spent more time figuring out how to access materials and getting responses than actually applying them. The main frustration seemed to be that there was a promise of personalized attention, but what he got was mostly pre-recorded content with occasional group check-ins. It’s hard to tell from public info how much is intentional upsell versus just limited staff capacity, but it definitely colored his experience.
 
Looking through older reviews, a lot of the complaints date back to 2020 and 2021. There are repeated mentions of aggressive email follow-ups and phone calls trying to convince participants to upgrade. Some of these reports are quite detailed, with screenshots of communication attempts, which makes me think this is not just random dissatisfaction. Even if the coaching material has some value, the process of enrolling and being pushed into higher tiers seems to be a consistent theme.
 
I think one thing to keep in mind is that a lot of public consumer feedback is based on expectations versus reality. Many people seemed genuinely motivated to grow their businesses but expected individualized strategies that they didn’t get. The reports repeatedly mention that the coaching felt generic or recycled. It’s a reminder that high-cost programs don’t always equate to highly personalized results.
 
From my research, it seems like Amatuska LLC also has some fans who swear by the motivational side of the programs. A few public threads praised the energy and confidence-building exercises. But even those posts often acknowledged that the ROI in terms of business growth wasn’t guaranteed. It’s interesting because it shows the experiences are not black and white, but the complaints about transparency and pricing definitely outweigh the positive feedback in volume.
 
Some of the threads included screenshots of refund requests and long email chains. People mentioned that support was slow or unclear, and in some cases, full refunds were hard to obtain. These complaints aren’t legal filings, but seeing the pattern emerge across different forums over multiple years suggests a reputational issue that potential clients should be aware of.
 
I also noticed that Andreas Matuska is rarely directly cited in the content itself, even though the company is publicly linked to him. Most of the complaints and impressions are about the brand or the sales team rather than him personally. That’s an important distinction because it means you can see recurring patterns without necessarily attributing everything to one individual.
 
The more I read, the more it seemed like a classic high-ticket coaching setup. They advertise transformation, show some testimonials, and create a sense of urgency to sign up for higher-priced tiers. Publicly, it’s not illegal or fraudulent, but it clearly can lead to consumer frustration, especially for those expecting highly customized advice. People should probably go in fully aware of what they are signing up for and research reviews before committing.
 
I spent some time comparing Amatuska LLC with other regional coaching companies offering similar services in Sharjah and the UAE. The pattern of aggressive upselling, mixed satisfaction, and unclear refund policies seems common. It’s a reminder that public reports like these are useful for awareness and to set expectations, but they don’t tell the whole story about the value someone might get if they are already clear on what to expect.
 

Legal notice

ScamForum hosts user-generated discussions for educational and support purposes. Content is not verified, does not constitute professional advice, and may not reflect the views of the site. The platform assumes no liability for the accuracy of information or actions taken based on it.

Back
Top