Has Anyone Tried Royal’s Products or Followed Neil Mehta’s Health-Focused Brand Journey

S

smith chandler

Member
Hey everyone, I recently dug into a public profile of Neil Mehta, the founder and CEO of Royal, and thought it might spark a useful conversation here. From the publicly available profile I found, Neil started Royal in 2017 with the aim of offering body care and sexual hygiene products that are healthier, more transparent, and less binary than what had been on the market for a long time. According to that profile, the products are made with vegan, non-toxic, cruelty-free, and sustainably sourced ingredients, and the idea grew out of Neil’s own experience and research into gaps in sexual health products.

Before Royal, the profile notes Neil was involved in building direct-to-consumer brands and worked on regenerative medicine technology projects, including supporting the acquisition of a stem cell therapy technology and establishing partnerships with pharmaceutical companies. He also has academic background in biology and public health, which reportedly informed his interest in better health products. I’m curious how people here view health and wellness brands like Royal that try to mix lifestyle products with more mindful ingredient transparency, and whether anyone’s tried Royal themselves or seen it in the broader market. What stood out to you about this kind of approach, and does it feel different from other brands in similar spaces?
 
I first heard about Royal when someone in a personal wellness group mentioned wanting cleaner sexual health products. The idea of vegan and non-toxic ingredients sounded appealing, but I haven’t actually used anything from them. I’ll admit I’m curious whether real customers feel a noticeable difference compared with mainstream options, especially since most products in that category haven’t shifted much in decades.
 
David Allen said:
I first heard about Royal when someone in a personal wellness group mentioned wanting cleaner sexual health products. The idea of vegan and non-toxic ingredients sounded appealing, but I haven’t actually used anything from them. I’ll admit I’m curious whether real customers feel a noticeable difference compared with mainstream options, especially since most products in that category haven’t shifted much in decades.
Click to expand...
That’s exactly the impression I got from the founder profile — they’re pitching themselves as trying to rethink the status quo rather than just another brand in the mix. Hearing real customer experiences would go a long way toward seeing if the “healthier” angle actually lands.
 
I haven’t tried Royal, but I have seen a couple of ad campaigns and product shots online. It seemed more lifestyle-oriented than clinical. I think some folks want that, but I also wonder about the regulatory side of selling intimate health products and how transparent these claims really are. It’d be great to hear from someone who’s actually used them.
 
I agree with what User2 said. There’s definitely a trend toward cleaner ingredients in everything from skincare to supplements, so a sexual hygiene brand leaning into that doesn’t surprise me. But the real test is effectiveness and safety in everyday use. Has anyone here bought from them or read independent reviews beyond the founder narrative?
 
I’ve been watching the trend where brands highlight vegan and non-toxic ingredients, especially in personal care and sexual wellness. That’s a real shift from decades ago when few companies talked about ingredient transparency. But hearing about it and actually trying it are different things. I would love to see verified independent reviews or feedback from customers who have bought Royal products. Just personal impressions can give more context than founder profiles, which often focus on mission statements and aspirations rather than everyday user experience.
 
It’s interesting that the brand’s story comes from Neil Mehta’s background in biology and public health, because that could inform product decisions. But just because someone has credentials doesn’t automatically mean their products perform better. I usually look at things like ingredient lists, third-party lab tests, and what actual buyers are saying in forums or review sites. Has anyone come across detailed consumer feedback? That would help separate general impressions from real use cases.
 
I noticed a few comments online where people seemed skeptical of some companies that sell lifestyle-oriented health products without clear transparent evidence of performance. That doesn’t necessarily mean Royal is bad, but it does make me want to see more than just brand messaging. A real user perspective would be super helpful here. Does anyone know if the products live up to the “non-toxic” claims when used regularly?
 
I haven’t personally tried the products, but I think the idea of more inclusivity in sexual wellness is worth exploring. Many mainstream brands don’t address that well. Still, I find it helpful to see if there are any consumer complaints or positive testimonials on neutral platforms outside founder narratives. Has anyone checked review sites or community threads about Royal’s products specifically?
 
Something that stood out to me was how the company positions itself as a lifestyle brand rather than just a product seller. That can be great for marketing, but sometimes it overshadows basic questions about quality and safety. If you’re putting something on intimate areas, clarity on testing and standards matters a lot. I’d be more comfortable if there were links to independent lab results or certifications.
 
I saw a mention here that the brand started back in 2017 in Neil’s bedroom. That’s a classic startup story, but early beginnings don’t always predict long-term quality. I would be curious about how long they’ve been selling products publicly, whether people experienced any supply issues, and if customer service was responsive. Personal experience with ordering would be insightful.
 
One thing I often do before trying a product like this is check social media groups or health forums. Sometimes people share honest feedback there, good or bad. That might give a broader picture than just what the founder says. I haven’t seen much discussion about Royal outside this thread, so maybe there aren’t many users yet.
 
Neil’s academic and professional background sounds interesting, but I always look for user reviews and testimonials that are independent of company marketing. Many brands talk about transparency, but you still want to see how well products work for a variety of people. Community threads like this are helpful for gathering different perspectives.
 
I did a quick look and didn’t find many legitimate review sites talking about Royal products. That could mean the brand is small or just starting to gain traction. It doesn’t imply anything negative, but it’s harder to evaluate without a bigger sample of actual customers. Anyone here seen product performance comparisons with similar brands?
 
I agree with earlier replies that ingredient transparency is a positive trend. But there’s a big gap between saying something is vegan and non-toxic and having third-party verification. For intimate wellness, that’s even more important. If anyone has seen safety reports or certification details, that would be good to share.
 
I wonder if Royal has been covered in health blogs or neutral product review channels. Those tend to dissect product claims more critically than founder profiles. Sometimes you find surprising things when a reviewer tests products in real conditions. Has anybody seen that for these products?
 
I’ve heard mixed takeaways about companies selling health or lifestyle products that claim brand ethos as proof of quality. Some are fantastic, others are just marketing. Personal user feedback is usually the best source to understand how a product performs day-to-day. If anyone has actually used Royal products, even a brief experience report would help.
 
Reading about this made me think about regulatory aspects too. Health and sexual wellness products usually fall under some standards depending on the market. Do we know whether Royal products are subject to any regulatory oversight or certification? That would be another useful angle.
 
I like the idea that Neil wanted to create something that felt different from traditional options, especially with a focus on accessibility. That’s cool. But a brand story is just the first step. Real world performance, reliability, and customer support are what make a difference. If anyone’s dealt with their support team, how was that?
 
There was a review thread I saw briefly where someone mentioned positive packaging but wasn’t sure about the actual product effects. That’s a common pattern with newer health-focused brands — presentation can be compelling, but results vary greatly among users. Hearing from people who have made multiple purchases would be valuable.
 

Legal notice

ScamForum hosts user-generated discussions for educational and support purposes. Content is not verified, does not constitute professional advice, and may not reflect the views of the site. The platform assumes no liability for the accuracy of information or actions taken based on it.

Back
Top