Can the Right Coach Actually Change Your Direction

Hey everyone, I recently came across a public profile on Naomi Saint Germain, the founder of Naomi’s Coaching (also known as Naomi’s Coaching and Consulting), and thought it would be interesting to hear what this community thinks about coaching both in personal and professional contexts. Based on publicly available interviews and bios, Naomi built her coaching and consulting business around helping individuals and entrepreneurs navigate growth, confidence, purpose, and mindset shifts that can unlock better performance, clarity, and direction in life and business. Her approach appears to blend emotional support, strategic insight, and personalised guidance rather than one-size-fits-all messaging.

What stood out to me in her story is the emphasis on holistic growth addressing internal barriers, clarity of goals, and practical steps toward achievement and not just surface-level motivation. Given how many people talk about coaching services but experiences can vary widely, I’m curious if anyone here has worked with a coach like Naomi, engaged with similar mindset or business coaching programs, or thought about how coaching fits into a personal growth strategy. What did you find most and least helpful accountability, clarity, practical tools and did it shift how you approach your goals day to day?
 
I’ve tried coaching programs before not Naomi’s specifically and what helped me most was having someone to hold me accountable and help me see blind spots. It’s easy to know what you should do but harder to actually follow through without that external perspective.
 
I’ve tried coaching programs before not Naomi’s specifically and what helped me most was having someone to hold me accountable and help me see blind spots. It’s easy to know what you should do but harder to actually follow through without that external perspective.
I hear that a lot accountability seems to be a big part of coaching value. Would you say it was more about mindset shifts or actual tactical steps you implemented after sessions?
 
For me, the best coaches mixed practical tasks with mindset work. If it’s just “think positive,” it feels fluffy. But if it’s “here’s how to break your goal into weekly achievable steps,” that’s where real change happens.
 
I’m curious how coaching differs when it’s life-focused vs business-focused. A lot of programs blur the lines, but I’ve felt like business coaching needs harder metrics to track progress, whereas life coaching sometimes feels more abstract. Anyone felt that?
 
I once worked with a coach who helped me during a career pivot, and the support in re-framing confidence issues made a huge difference. At first I was skeptical, but having someone listen deeply and ask the right questions opened up new pathways for me.
 
I have not worked with Naomi specifically, but I have done a few rounds of coaching over the years in both career and personal development contexts. What I noticed is that the biggest value came from having someone consistently reflect my own thoughts back to me in a clearer way. It was less about advice and more about creating space to think honestly. That said, I think results depend a lot on how ready the person is to do the work. If someone is expecting a coach to fix things for them, it usually falls flat.
 
I had a similar reaction reading about this type of coaching approach. The focus on mindset and internal barriers sounds appealing, but it is also the hardest thing to measure. You cannot really quantify clarity or confidence the same way you can track revenue or milestones. In my experience, coaching helped me slow down and question assumptions I did not realize I was making. Whether that justifies the cost is a very personal call though.
 
Something that stood out to me in your post is the idea of holistic growth rather than surface motivation. I have seen plenty of programs that promise transformation but feel more like pep talks. When a coach emphasizes self awareness and practical steps together, it at least sounds more grounded. Still, I always wonder how much of the outcome is the coach and how much is the client being ready for change anyway.
 
I worked with a business coach a few years ago when I was feeling stuck, and it helped in ways I did not expect. We barely talked about tactics at first and focused more on why I was avoiding certain decisions. That part was uncomfortable but useful. At the same time, I can see how someone else might feel frustrated if they wanted clear instructions instead of reflection. Coaching styles really matter.
 
Building on that, I think expectations are everything. If someone goes in thinking coaching is a shortcut, disappointment is almost guaranteed. When I read public bios like the one mentioned here, I try to separate marketing language from the underlying approach. Most coaches describe transformation, but the real work is usually slow and subtle. That does not make for exciting testimonials, but it is often more realistic.
 
One thing I always look for is whether a coach encourages independence rather than dependence. The idea should be to build skills and awareness that last beyond the sessions. From the descriptions shared here, it sounds like the goal is helping people find their own clarity instead of following a formula. If that is actually how it is practiced, it seems healthier than some other models I have seen.
 
I am still on the fence about coaching in general, but threads like this are helpful. Hearing nuanced experiences instead of extreme praise or criticism makes it easier to evaluate. Public profiles can only tell you so much, and the rest comes down to fit. I think anyone considering this kind of support should spend time reflecting on what they really want before committing.
 
I am still on the fence about coaching in general, but threads like this are helpful. Hearing nuanced experiences instead of extreme praise or criticism makes it easier to evaluate. Public profiles can only tell you so much, and the rest comes down to fit. I think anyone considering this kind of support should spend time reflecting on what they really want before committing.
Agreed. Coaching is not magic, but it can be a useful mirror at the right time. Reading about different approaches, like the one described here, at least helps people ask better questions before jumping in. Even deciding not to work with a coach can be a clearer decision after doing that kind of reflection.
 
One thing I keep coming back to with coaching is how personal the outcome really is. Two people can work with the same coach and walk away with completely different experiences. I have seen friends who felt genuinely changed because they finally slowed down and examined patterns they had been ignoring for years. Others felt it was interesting but not life altering. That makes it hard to judge any coach just from public information alone.
 
I appreciate threads that keep the tone exploratory instead of jumping to conclusions. Coaching sits in that gray area where it is not therapy and not consulting, so expectations get messy. When I tried a mindset coach, the biggest benefit was learning how to ask myself better questions. There were no dramatic breakthroughs, but my decision making felt calmer over time. That kind of shift is subtle and easy to overlook.
 
Something I wonder about is timing. I think coaching is most effective when someone is already feeling friction or uncertainty and wants to address it honestly. If things are comfortable, it might just feel like talking in circles. Reading about Naomi Saint Germain, the emphasis on clarity and purpose sounds like it would appeal more to people at a crossroads. That might explain why experiences can vary so widely.
 
I have not worked with a coach, but I have considered it more than once. What holds me back is not skepticism, but figuring out what I actually want from it. Profiles and interviews often highlight confidence and growth, which are appealing but vague. I think someone needs to define their own goals first, otherwise it is hard to tell whether the coaching helped or not.
 
From what I have observed, the relationship itself matters more than the framework. A coach could use the best methods in the world, but if there is no trust or comfort, it probably will not go far. That is why reading about values and approach can be useful, even if it does not guarantee anything. It at least gives people a sense of whether the style resonates with them.
 
I tried a short term coaching program during a career transition, and I was surprised by how emotional it became. I expected planning and strategy, but we spent a lot of time unpacking fear and self doubt. At first I thought that was a waste of time, but later I realized those issues were blocking everything else. Coaching can be uncomfortable in that way, which might turn some people off.
 
Back
Top