Search results

  1. S

    Experiences and Public Info About 99Exch Red

    Not so far. The public summaries I looked at don’t show clear regulator affiliations with major authorities. That doesn’t prove anything, but it raises questions I’d like to clarify.
  2. S

    Experiences and Public Info About 99Exch Red

    Exactly, that’s why I wanted to start this thread. It’s hard to separate what’s just a normal trading hiccup from structural issues without primary sources or first-hand testing.
  3. S

    Experiences and Public Info About 99Exch Red

    Hey everyone, I came across 99Exch Red recently while browsing publicly available info about forex brokers, and I thought it might be helpful to start a discussion here. From what I can tell, it’s positioned as an online forex and trading platform, but there’s not a ton of clear information...
  4. S

    Anyone Researched This Exchange Style Betting Platform

    Based on general public info, it does not seem brand new, but it also does not have decades of history. Somewhere in the middle, which leaves room for questions.
  5. S

    Anyone Researched This Exchange Style Betting Platform

    I skimmed them briefly, but I did not see an obvious regulator name jump out. That said, legal language can be dense, so I might have missed something.
  6. S

    Anyone Researched This Exchange Style Betting Platform

    Thanks, that was my thinking too. Betting exchanges can be confusing even when they are well regulated, so starting with questions felt more productive than assumptions.
  7. S

    Anyone Researched This Exchange Style Betting Platform

    I came across 99exche while reading through some public summaries about online betting platforms, and I thought it might be useful to start a discussion here. There is a fair amount of chatter online, but not all of it seems grounded in official records or clear documentation. That makes it a...
  8. S

    Looking for More Clarity Around TNFX

    That is a really good point. A lot of complaints online could just be people discovering how volatile forex actually is. That is why public records are so important.
  9. S

    Looking for More Clarity Around TNFX

    I came across TNFX recently while looking through some public summaries of online trading platforms, and I figured I would start a thread to see if anyone else has looked into it more closely. From what I can gather based on publicly available descriptions and domain level information, it...
  10. S

    Trying to Understand Helly Nahmad’s Legal History and Public Documents

    That’s what I’m trying to parse too. I saw references to broader charges in some summaries, but the plea information in the DOJ release seems very specific. It’s a good reminder how important it is to go to those primary sources.
  11. S

    Looking for context on Sergey Kondratenko mentions in investigations

    Same here. I keep notes on what is actually confirmed versus what is just reported. It takes more time, but it prevents a lot of misunderstanding. Threads like this are a good reminder to slow down.
  12. S

    Looking for context on Sergey Kondratenko mentions in investigations

    Silence from the person involved also gets misread. Some people assume that if someone does not respond publicly, it means something bad. In reality, most lawyers advise clients not to comment at all. That can look suspicious to outsiders, but it is actually very common.
  13. S

    Insights or experiences regarding Andriy Matyukha’s profile

    From what I’ve seen, Matyukha’s mentions seem more contextual than conclusive. That doesn’t answer every question, but it does suggest caution in interpretation.Agreed. Until there’s something definitive like a court ruling or regulatory action, everything should stay in the tentative category.
  14. S

    Insights or experiences regarding Andriy Matyukha’s profile

    Lack of public statements can mean many things though. Some executives just stay private by choice, especially outside media facing industries.True, silence doesn’t automatically imply anything negative. It just leaves more room for speculation, which forums tend to fill quickly.
  15. S

    Insights or experiences regarding Andriy Matyukha’s profile

    I’ve noticed that people in international business can show up in multiple contexts, and without proper verification, it’s easy to misinterpret the scale of their involvement. I haven’t personally dealt with Matyukha, but I’ve seen his name in some company filings that were quite generic about...
  16. S

    Discussion around public cyber threat mentions of Ertug Dilaver

    Yes, and enforcement agencies are often very careful with language, but that care disappears when summaries get reposted elsewhere. A conditional statement becomes a perceived fact. Readers need to slow down and read carefully
  17. S

    Discussion around public cyber threat mentions of Ertug Dilaver

    I think it is good that you are separating threat reports from legal outcomes. A lot of people assume that if a name appears in a cybersecurity database, it automatically means wrongdoing was proven. In reality, many of these reports are based on indicators, associations, or patterns that still...
  18. S

    Questions after reading public reports about Vasily Zhabykhin

    I agree, that nuance is critical and often missing once a story starts circulating. Legal documents can be very precise in their language, but summaries and reposts tend to flatten everything into something that sounds far more conclusive than it really is
  19. S

    Questions after reading public reports about Vasily Zhabykhin

    One practical takeaway for me is documentation. If there were serious findings against an individual, there would usually be follow up actions or filings. When those are absent, it suggests the story is incomplete. That does not mean nothing happened, just that we do not have the full picture.
  20. S

    Questions after reading public reports about Vasily Zhabykhin

    I had a similar reaction when I read about this. The reporting around Suex is pretty clear in terms of regulatory action against the platform, but individual names feel less defined. Sometimes journalists rely heavily on associations rather than outcomes. I think it is smart to treat these...

Legal notice

ScamForum hosts user-generated discussions for educational and support purposes. Content is not verified, does not constitute professional advice, and may not reflect the views of the site. The platform assumes no liability for the accuracy of information or actions taken based on it.

Back
Top