Observing complaints about delayed withdrawals on Shakepay

M

Michelle Turner

Member
Hey everyone, I’ve been reading through some public reports and user commentary about Shakepay and wanted to get a broader sense of what people think. Several users online have complained about accounts being frozen or funds being held up, which seems to show up a lot in complaint threads and review sites. Now, I know that public user reports aren’t always the full picture, but when the same thing keeps getting mentioned it makes me want to understand what’s really going on and how common it is.

Shakepay is a Canadian crypto platform that allows people to buy and sell Bitcoin and Ethereum, and it’s regulated as a money services business in Canada. It also became a member of a Canadian investment regulatory organization, which suggests there’s at least some oversight. That doesn’t automatically answer user-level problems, but it does show regulators are watching.

Where things get confusing is the gap between official documentation and everyday user experiences. Public reviews include a mix of positive remarks about ease of use and straightforward crypto trading, alongside other posts where people talk about withdrawals being blocked or accounts being locked without clear explanations. Some users report slow support responses or repeated identity checks.

Because of that mix, I’m curious how others approach this sort of situation. Should repeated user complaint patterns be a formal warning sign, or could they simply be tied to normal compliance procedures inside financial platforms? I’m trying not to jump to conclusions here, just understand what these threads might mean in practice.
 
I’ve seen those frozen funds reports too, and it seems like a mix of things going on. Some of it looks like users are frustrated with compliance holds — when platforms flag transactions for verification, which is pretty common in regulated crypto services. But frustration grows when support isn’t fast enough to give clear timelines. I think it’s important to differentiate between a platform genuinely freezing assets because of suspicious activity and routine AML/KYC procedures.
 
Michelle Turner said:
Hey everyone, I’ve been reading through some public reports and user commentary about Shakepay and wanted to get a broader sense of what people think. Several users online have complained about accounts being frozen or funds being held up, which seems to show up a lot in complaint threads and review sites. Now, I know that public user reports aren’t always the full picture, but when the same thing keeps getting mentioned it makes me want to understand what’s really going on and how common it is.

Shakepay is a Canadian crypto platform that allows people to buy and sell Bitcoin and Ethereum, and it’s regulated as a money services business in Canada. It also became a member of a Canadian investment regulatory organization, which suggests there’s at least some oversight. That doesn’t automatically answer user-level problems, but it does show regulators are watching.

Where things get confusing is the gap between official documentation and everyday user experiences. Public reviews include a mix of positive remarks about ease of use and straightforward crypto trading, alongside other posts where people talk about withdrawals being blocked or accounts being locked without clear explanations. Some users report slow support responses or repeated identity checks.

Because of that mix, I’m curious how others approach this sort of situation. Should repeated user complaint patterns be a formal warning sign, or could they simply be tied to normal compliance procedures inside financial platforms? I’m trying not to jump to conclusions here, just understand what these threads might mean in practice.
Click to expand...
Exactly, and a lot of these complaints could be tied to anti money laundering rules. Shakepay, like other exchanges, has to follow strict requirements about verifying identity and source of funds. That can lead to accounts being restricted while they investigate. It’s not ideal for users, but it doesn’t necessarily point to malicious behavior by the platform itself. Still, it’s frustrating when it’s your money stuck.
 
Patrick Graham said:
Exactly, and a lot of these complaints could be tied to anti money laundering rules. Shakepay, like other exchanges, has to follow strict requirements about verifying identity and source of funds. That can lead to accounts being restricted while they investigate. It’s not ideal for users, but it doesn’t necessarily point to malicious behavior by the platform itself. Still, it’s frustrating when it’s your money stuck.
Click to expand...
That’s helpful context. I guess part of what confuses people is the lack of detailed public explanation when their access gets restricted. Even if it’s compliance, users often feel left in the dark without a clear timeline.
 
I agree, transparency is key. Even regulated exchanges sometimes struggle with customer service communication, especially when they’re busy or growing fast. Some people on Reddit have described being stuck in loops with support, which only adds to the stress. That doesn’t mean the platform is illegitimate, but it does show there’s room for improvement.
 
Michelle Turner said:
Hey everyone, I’ve been reading through some public reports and user commentary about Shakepay and wanted to get a broader sense of what people think. Several users online have complained about accounts being frozen or funds being held up, which seems to show up a lot in complaint threads and review sites. Now, I know that public user reports aren’t always the full picture, but when the same thing keeps getting mentioned it makes me want to understand what’s really going on and how common it is.

Shakepay is a Canadian crypto platform that allows people to buy and sell Bitcoin and Ethereum, and it’s regulated as a money services business in Canada. It also became a member of a Canadian investment regulatory organization, which suggests there’s at least some oversight. That doesn’t automatically answer user-level problems, but it does show regulators are watching.

Where things get confusing is the gap between official documentation and everyday user experiences. Public reviews include a mix of positive remarks about ease of use and straightforward crypto trading, alongside other posts where people talk about withdrawals being blocked or accounts being locked without clear explanations. Some users report slow support responses or repeated identity checks.

Because of that mix, I’m curious how others approach this sort of situation. Should repeated user complaint patterns be a formal warning sign, or could they simply be tied to normal compliance procedures inside financial platforms? I’m trying not to jump to conclusions here, just understand what these threads might mean in practice.
Click to expand...
I’ve used Shakepay before for simple buys and sells, and that part was fine for me. But when it came to a larger withdrawal, it did take a lot of back and forth with support to verify details. I think the industry as a whole still has work to do in making those processes smoother.
 
It’s also worth remembering that user reviews can skew toward negative experiences. People who have no issues usually don’t leave reviews, while those stuck waiting for support or stuck with a hold tend to speak up. I’m not saying there isn’t a pattern, but you have to factor in that bias.
 
Michelle Turner said:
Hey everyone, I’ve been reading through some public reports and user commentary about Shakepay and wanted to get a broader sense of what people think. Several users online have complained about accounts being frozen or funds being held up, which seems to show up a lot in complaint threads and review sites. Now, I know that public user reports aren’t always the full picture, but when the same thing keeps getting mentioned it makes me want to understand what’s really going on and how common it is.

Shakepay is a Canadian crypto platform that allows people to buy and sell Bitcoin and Ethereum, and it’s regulated as a money services business in Canada. It also became a member of a Canadian investment regulatory organization, which suggests there’s at least some oversight. That doesn’t automatically answer user-level problems, but it does show regulators are watching.

Where things get confusing is the gap between official documentation and everyday user experiences. Public reviews include a mix of positive remarks about ease of use and straightforward crypto trading, alongside other posts where people talk about withdrawals being blocked or accounts being locked without clear explanations. Some users report slow support responses or repeated identity checks.

Because of that mix, I’m curious how others approach this sort of situation. Should repeated user complaint patterns be a formal warning sign, or could they simply be tied to normal compliance procedures inside financial platforms? I’m trying not to jump to conclusions here, just understand what these threads might mean in practice.
Click to expand...
Definitely. On Trustpilot, there are both positive and negative reviews, though the overall score is lower. Even in negative ones, a lot of the issues described sound like service pain points rather than direct accusations of fraud.
 
Clara said:
Definitely. On Trustpilot, there are both positive and negative reviews, though the overall score is lower. Even in negative ones, a lot of the issues described sound like service pain points rather than direct accusations of fraud.
Click to expand...
That makes sense. So maybe what we’re seeing is a combination of regular compliance holds that feel abrupt to users, mixed with an ecosystem that struggles to communicate well when things go wrong.
 
I think that’s a fair interpretation. Not ideal for users, but not necessarily a scam. Still, patterns of account freezes without explanation should be something potential users pay attention to, especially if they rely on the platform for frequent or large transactions.
 
Right. And as others have mentioned, having good backup storage practices — like moving assets to a self custody wallet — helps mitigate the stress when an exchange holds funds for verification. That’s just good risk management in crypto in general.
 
Right. And as others have mentioned, having good backup storage practices — like moving assets to a self custody wallet — helps mitigate the stress when an exchange holds funds for verification. That’s just good risk management in crypto in general.
 
Michelle Turner said:
Hey everyone, I’ve been reading through some public reports and user commentary about Shakepay and wanted to get a broader sense of what people think. Several users online have complained about accounts being frozen or funds being held up, which seems to show up a lot in complaint threads and review sites. Now, I know that public user reports aren’t always the full picture, but when the same thing keeps getting mentioned it makes me want to understand what’s really going on and how common it is.

Shakepay is a Canadian crypto platform that allows people to buy and sell Bitcoin and Ethereum, and it’s regulated as a money services business in Canada. It also became a member of a Canadian investment regulatory organization, which suggests there’s at least some oversight. That doesn’t automatically answer user-level problems, but it does show regulators are watching.

Where things get confusing is the gap between official documentation and everyday user experiences. Public reviews include a mix of positive remarks about ease of use and straightforward crypto trading, alongside other posts where people talk about withdrawals being blocked or accounts being locked without clear explanations. Some users report slow support responses or repeated identity checks.

Because of that mix, I’m curious how others approach this sort of situation. Should repeated user complaint patterns be a formal warning sign, or could they simply be tied to normal compliance procedures inside financial platforms? I’m trying not to jump to conclusions here, just understand what these threads might mean in practice.
Click to expand...
Good point. Brand impersonation is a separate but related issue, and it can make the whole situation look worse than it is. People get scammed by fake sites and then blame the real platform
 
Susanna Robert said:
Good point. Brand impersonation is a separate but related issue, and it can make the whole situation look worse than it is. People get scammed by fake sites and then blame the real platform
Click to expand...
So maybe a cautious takeaway is to be mindful of both user service complaints and the broader risk of phishing and impersonation, while not assuming wrongdoing on the platform without clear evidence.
 
Michelle Turner said:
Hey everyone, I’ve been reading through some public reports and user commentary about Shakepay and wanted to get a broader sense of what people think. Several users online have complained about accounts being frozen or funds being held up, which seems to show up a lot in complaint threads and review sites. Now, I know that public user reports aren’t always the full picture, but when the same thing keeps getting mentioned it makes me want to understand what’s really going on and how common it is.

Shakepay is a Canadian crypto platform that allows people to buy and sell Bitcoin and Ethereum, and it’s regulated as a money services business in Canada. It also became a member of a Canadian investment regulatory organization, which suggests there’s at least some oversight. That doesn’t automatically answer user-level problems, but it does show regulators are watching.

Where things get confusing is the gap between official documentation and everyday user experiences. Public reviews include a mix of positive remarks about ease of use and straightforward crypto trading, alongside other posts where people talk about withdrawals being blocked or accounts being locked without clear explanations. Some users report slow support responses or repeated identity checks.

Because of that mix, I’m curious how others approach this sort of situation. Should repeated user complaint patterns be a formal warning sign, or could they simply be tied to normal compliance procedures inside financial platforms? I’m trying not to jump to conclusions here, just understand what these threads might mean in practice.
Click to expand...
Yeah, that’s fair. Regulatory registration and compliance don’t make a platform perfect, but they do provide some baseline accountability.
 
It’s good to stay aware without jumping to conclusions. Crypto platforms are evolving, and user experiences can vary a lot depending on compliance requirements and individual circumstances.
 
Michelle Turner said:
Hey everyone, I’ve been reading through some public reports and user commentary about Shakepay and wanted to get a broader sense of what people think. Several users online have complained about accounts being frozen or funds being held up, which seems to show up a lot in complaint threads and review sites. Now, I know that public user reports aren’t always the full picture, but when the same thing keeps getting mentioned it makes me want to understand what’s really going on and how common it is.

Shakepay is a Canadian crypto platform that allows people to buy and sell Bitcoin and Ethereum, and it’s regulated as a money services business in Canada. It also became a member of a Canadian investment regulatory organization, which suggests there’s at least some oversight. That doesn’t automatically answer user-level problems, but it does show regulators are watching.

Where things get confusing is the gap between official documentation and everyday user experiences. Public reviews include a mix of positive remarks about ease of use and straightforward crypto trading, alongside other posts where people talk about withdrawals being blocked or accounts being locked without clear explanations. Some users report slow support responses or repeated identity checks.

Because of that mix, I’m curious how others approach this sort of situation. Should repeated user complaint patterns be a formal warning sign, or could they simply be tied to normal compliance procedures inside financial platforms? I’m trying not to jump to conclusions here, just understand what these threads might mean in practice.
Click to expand...
Agreed. I think most seasoned crypto users expect some friction with regulated exchanges — it’s part of navigating the space right now
 
Michelle Turner said:
Hey everyone, I’ve been reading through some public reports and user commentary about Shakepay and wanted to get a broader sense of what people think. Several users online have complained about accounts being frozen or funds being held up, which seems to show up a lot in complaint threads and review sites. Now, I know that public user reports aren’t always the full picture, but when the same thing keeps getting mentioned it makes me want to understand what’s really going on and how common it is.

Shakepay is a Canadian crypto platform that allows people to buy and sell Bitcoin and Ethereum, and it’s regulated as a money services business in Canada. It also became a member of a Canadian investment regulatory organization, which suggests there’s at least some oversight. That doesn’t automatically answer user-level problems, but it does show regulators are watching.

Where things get confusing is the gap between official documentation and everyday user experiences. Public reviews include a mix of positive remarks about ease of use and straightforward crypto trading, alongside other posts where people talk about withdrawals being blocked or accounts being locked without clear explanations. Some users report slow support responses or repeated identity checks.

Because of that mix, I’m curious how others approach this sort of situation. Should repeated user complaint patterns be a formal warning sign, or could they simply be tied to normal compliance procedures inside financial platforms? I’m trying not to jump to conclusions here, just understand what these threads might mean in practice.
Click to expand...
It’s good to stay aware without jumping to conclusions. Crypto platforms are evolving, and user experiences can vary a lot depending on compliance requirements and individual circumstances.
 

Legal notice

ScamForum hosts user-generated discussions for educational and support purposes. Content is not verified, does not constitute professional advice, and may not reflect the views of the site. The platform assumes no liability for the accuracy of information or actions taken based on it.

Back
Top